steal this book or something like that

Filed under: crimes, coverups + conspiracies — admin March 9, 2008 @ 11:58 pm

You remember Hoffman’s opus, “Steal This Book”, a manifesto for all things anti-establishment, urging future readers to go ahead and break the legs I’m standing on.  There was a similar one called Steal This Computer Book released by O’Reilly, which I thought was kinda a good subtle reference to the past.  I checked it out, some interesting stuff, but maybe not worth the cashola.  I recently saw this posting on bOING bOING about the most commonly stolen books.  It referenced Flying Off The Shelves: The Pleasures and Perils of Chasing Book Theives. Tellingly, the ten most commonly stolen authors are:

  • Charles Bukowski
  • Jim Thompson
  • Philip K. Dick
  • William S. Burroughs
  • Any Graphic Novel

It goes on to say that Crowley’s books have to be kept behind glass in many stores because they dissappear so fast!    I have read a few of Bukowski’s books, being the alcoholic humorist, I suppose I can kinda see it, what with his anti-everything life perspective.  Thompson, I don’t really know, Philip K. Dick is of course a classic and brilliant scifi writer, though I still don’t see the connection.  Burroughs, well what more needs to be said there!Anyway, interesting stuff.  I’m surprised more libertarian classics don’t show up in the list. 

read - vision of 2051

Filed under: crimes, coverups + conspiracies — admin August 17, 2006 @ 1:32 am

So much to read, so little time. The Vision of 2051 by Joe Firmage.

word up to the pre-raphaelite brotherhood

Filed under: World Events + History, crimes, coverups + conspiracies — admin July 25, 2006 @ 12:24 am

Y’all know who the pre-raphaelites were, don’t you? Ok, I didn’t either until recently, but it’s a good read, and we’re down with them, yo!

are you an aquatic ape?

Filed under: crimes, coverups + conspiracies — admin @ 12:18 am

Perhaps we were aquatic apes after we were savanah apes? So says this theory. Read through it, there seems to be a lot of sense to it, as it explains a lot other theories don’t.